
The only thing worse than the actual NBA draft is the constant breakdown of it prior and after. It blows my mind how in every draft, people can jump the gun and say great pick and terrible pick. The truth is, no one really knows.
There are only two things that can be evaluated in the immediate aftermath of the NBA draft:
1.)Where was the player projected to be drafted?
- If you take a player likely to have fallen into the second round with a lottery pick, you probably deserve some criticism, just as if a "top-ten worthy pick" drops to your team in the late first round and you nab him, your team will be given praise.
2.) Did it fill your team’s needs?
- Drafting the best available player is not always the best option. When your team has 3 point guards, it doesn’t make sense to draft a fourth, even if he is the best player.
These two points are common sense, but why are all these other factors brought in. How can the average fan gauge what kind of impact a player from Europe or Africa will have in the NBA. I can’t believe how many fans were clamoring for the likes of Bismack Biyombo and Jonas Valanciunas without ever having seen them play. Relying strictly on the words of writers and analysts, fans are criticizing their teams’ picks without ever having seen these guys play.
Its OK to be mad if your team didn’t select your favorite NCAA player, but hey give the new draftee some time (maybe a game??).

Knicks fans booed Iman Shumpert, mostly because he wasn’t the sexy pick at 17th overall. Although many believe that Shumpert could have went as late as the second round, the most important factor in determining a good draft pick is how he benefits his team. The Knicks felt they needed a defensive guard and not another 3-4 player, like fan-favorite Chris Singleton (In case you forgot Knick fans, you already have Carmelo Anthony).
My overall favorite is the giving of an "A" grade to the team with the number 1 and 4 picks. Why even bother with draft grades. The Cavs picked the consensus #1 and then selected a big guy out of Texas. Congratulations your team sucked so badly it had such high picks, therefore you deserve an A. A three-year old could have watched ESPN and picked Kyrie Irving.

And then it gets worse as the media grades the other team’s selections based basically off if they matched their own personal mock drafts. If the team went in another direction in which you thought they would’ve, it’s an instant F from that author.
Garbage
In the situation the NBA is currently in, with no certainty of when the season will begin, if ever (not to mention we still have free agency), how can you criticize a team over 1-2 picks in an incredibly anonymous draft. The answer is, you can’t. This isn’t football, where a player in any round can make an impact on the roster; this is the NBA where likely ¾ of these guys wont be playing in 6 years.
One thing that is certainly disappointing to those who like the college game was the amount of foreigners taken in the draft. Fans saw Big East standouts and March Madness heroes continue to get overlooked and exchange fans heard names had never heard of and couldn’t even pronounce.

Does this mark the beginning of the end of NCAA sports generating superstars? No, of course not. But it does serve as a wakeup call to American athletes that maybe the USA isn’t the only country that can contribute basketball talent, and our kids need to step up their game.
In the end though, this was a boring draft. I can’t remember being less enthused and having less knowledge of the players. But this doesn’t mean this won’t be an important draft. We have to wait and see how many Hall of Famers come out of this crop and how many busts are made. The strength of this draft won’t be determined in 2011. Instead let’s wait until 2021.









